Judge's note
Ranked 4th of 11, this combines excellent environmental detail with an ambitious, imaginative composition. Slightly weak tonal separation and crowded structural junctions place it below the more cohesive higher-ranked images.
Nano Banana (2.5 Flash) wins 55% of 100 direct comparisons against Seedream 4.0.
Both models received the same prompts. Wins and losses count only images judged together in the same call, the same comparisons the leaderboard Elo is fitted from.
| Category | Nano Banana (2.5 Flash) | Seedream 4.0 | Direct record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anime & Cartoon Style | 1110 | 933 | 5–1–4 |
| Architecture & Interiors | 896 | 967 | 3–3–4 |
| Complex Scenes | 993 | 1010 | 4–2–4 |
| Ghibli style | 982 | 971 | 6–1–3 |
| Graphic Design | 1127 | 1038 | 4–4–2 |
| Hands & Anatomy | 1096 | 959 | 7–0–3 |
| Photorealistic People & Portraits | 1002 | 1071 | 3–4–3 |
| Surreal & Creative Prompts | 905 | 955 | 3–4–3 |
| Text in Images | 949 | 913 | 5–2–3 |
| Ultra Hard | 818 | 940 | 2–4–4 |
| Criterion | Nano Banana (2.5 Flash) | Seedream 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt adherence | 1020 | 972 |
| Technical quality | 972 | 993 |
| Artistic merit | 985 | 989 |
| Detail execution | 960 | 1003 |
| Realism & coherence | 965 | 948 |