Summary for Text in Images
Generating clear, accurate, and contextually appropriate text remains a significant challenge for many AI models, but the top performers in this category are exceptionally reliable. This category clearly separates the elite models from the rest.
-
👑 Top Performers: The clear winners are Google's Imagen 4.0 Ultra and OpenAI's ChatGPT 4o, which demonstrated near-perfect accuracy and stylistic understanding across all prompts. Ideogram 3.0 (Quality) and Google's Nano Banana (2.5 Flash) are also in the top tier, showing remarkable consistency.
-
The 'Gibberish Text' Problem: A major trend is the failure of many models to handle secondary text. Models like DALL-E 3 and Imagen 3.0 might nail the main headline on a movie poster but fill the credit block with unreadable nonsense, severely impacting realism and usability.
-
Consistency is Key: While some models can produce a perfect image, consistency is what defines the best. Models like Midjourney v7 showed a shocking inability to handle even simple text prompts, resulting in some of the lowest scores despite high artistic potential in other areas.
-
Quick Conclusion: For reliable and professional-grade text in images, your go-to models should be Imagen 4.0 Ultra and ChatGPT 4o. For creative and stylish typography, Ideogram 3.0 (Quality) is also a fantastic choice.
General Analysis & Useful Insights
This category highlights a crucial differentiator in AI image generation: the ability to treat text not just as a visual element, but as meaningful data that must be rendered with precision.
Strengths of Top Performers
The elite models don't just spell correctly; they understand context and style.
Common Failure Modes
Even capable models can stumble, and the failures are often quite specific.
- The Gibberish Plague: This is the most common issue. A model creates a beautiful movie poster or magazine cover, but all text apart from the main headline is unreadable. This was a consistent problem for DALL-E 3 and Flux 1.1 Pro Ultra.
- Critical Misspellings: A single wrong letter can ruin an image. Seedream 3.0 produced a fantastic billboard scene that was rendered useless by the typo "PPEACE" instead of "PEACE" in the Times Square prompt. Similarly, Midjourney v7 failed on multiple prompts with basic misspellings.
- Ignoring Instructions: Some models ignored specific style instructions. MiniMax Image-01 impressively rendered a wrinkled T-shirt but reversed the requested font styles, a clear failure in prompt adherence.
- Context Blindness: FLUX.1 Kontext Max created an image for the Times Square prompt set in what was clearly an East Asian city, completely missing the required location context.
Best Model Analysis by Use Case
Different tasks require different strengths. Here’s a breakdown of the best models for specific text-related use cases based on this category's data.
📸 For Flawless Photorealism
When text must look like it was captured by a real camera, with authentic textures, lighting, and imperfections, these models excel.
🎨 For Creative & Stylized Typography
For graphic design, posters, or artistic projects where the style of the text is as important as its content.
📰 For Complex Layouts (Magazines & Posters)
When you need to generate images with multiple text elements, like headlines, sub-headings, and logos, in a coherent layout.
✅ The All-Rounder Recommendation
If you need one model that consistently delivers accurate text across a wide range of styles—from photorealistic to graphic design—with the lowest chance of errors:
- Winner: Imagen 4.0 Ultra is the most reliable and versatile model in this category. It scored an average of 9.83/10, flawlessly executing everything from a photorealistic birthday cake to a clean t-shirt design and an elegant motivational poster.
- Runner-Up: ChatGPT 4o is a very close second. It demonstrates a deep understanding of typography and design principles, consistently producing clean, accurate, and professional results.
